Follow

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Contact

How can we generate a single dictionary for the output of the code below?

Consider the following code, which is a simple code:

import networkx as nx
import math

G = nx.read_gml(".../networks/karate.gml",label=None)

X = nx.single_source_shortest_path_length(G,5,2)
t = 0 
for x in X:
    if (34,x) in G.edges() or (x,34) in G.edges():
        t += 1
    l = dict()
    l[x] = t + math.log10(5)
    print(l)

An example of the output of this code is as follows:

{5: 1.6989700043360187}
{1: 1.6989700043360187}
{11: 2.6989700043360187}
{7: 3.6989700043360187}
{32: 4.698970004336019}
{2: 5.698970004336019}
{3: 6.698970004336019}
{4: 7.698970004336019}
{6: 8.698970004336019}

How can we put these outputs into a dictionary or two? It means to merge them together.

MEDevel.com: Open-source for Healthcare and Education

Collecting and validating open-source software for healthcare, education, enterprise, development, medical imaging, medical records, and digital pathology.

Visit Medevel

We expect an output like the following:

{5: 1.6989700043360187, 1: 1.6989700043360187, 11: 2.6989700043360187, 7: 3.6989700043360187, 32: 4.698970004336019, 2: 5.698970004336019, 3: 6.698970004336019, 4: 7.698970004336019 ,6: 8.698970004336019}

>Solution :

Move l = dict() outside and above the for, and unindent the print(l) line. Like this:

import networkx as nx
import math

G = nx.read_gml(".../networks/karate.gml",label=None)

X = nx.single_source_shortest_path_length(G,5,2)
t = 0 
l = dict()
for x in X:
    if (34,x) in G.edges() or (x,34) in G.edges():
        t += 1
    l[x] = t + math.log10(5)
print(l)

Explanation: the code inside the loop (i.e. below the for line, indented) runs many times, once for each iteration of the loop. Since you want to create a single dict, and you want to print it once (after the loop has finished), you have to move those lines outside the loop.

Please note that the shorter and more common form l = {} does the same as l = dict().

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Discover more from Dev solutions

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading