There exist many similar questions for C, e.g. this one, but i’m searching for the simplest and most readable way in C++ to pass an C-array into a function without first defining a variable for it.
Given a
void f(double const* a)
these are not possible (but the first one is in C99):
f((double *[]){1,2});
f({1,2});
Of course defining a variable first is always possible, but that’s not what i’m looking for:
double a[] = { 1.2, 3.4 };
f(a);
However, it is possible to wrap things into a struct, f.e. like
struct A { double a[2]; };
f(A{2.3,4.5}.a);
and that type can be reused, so that’s already a little win
but this still feels clumsy.
Is there a simpler and more readable way? In one of the current standards or maybe an upcoming one?
EDIT: Sorry, i didn’t mention that before; i can’t change the target api. A pointer to a double is expected.
>Solution :
This function is great for that:
template<typename T, std::size_t N>
constexpr T* temporary_array(T(&& arr)[N]) noexcept { return arr; }
Then you can simply call f(temporary_array<double>({1,2})); (or f(temporary_array({1., 2.}))).
In C++20, you can write f(std::type_identity_t<double(&&)[]>{1,2}). f(std::type_identity<double[]>{1, 2}) should also work in any C++ version, but GCC has a long-standing bug that doesn’t allow this to compile.
Looking for standard library solutions, your struct A can be replaced with std::array<double, 2>. Writing out the size parameter is annoying, but it can be replaced with CTAD:
f(std::array{ 1., 2. }.data());
f(std::array<double, 2>{1, 2}.data());
// (These will call move constructors)
f(std::to_array<double>({1, 2}).data());
f(std::to_array({1., 2.}).data());