Follow

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Contact

Remove a vertex from a connected graph to obtain a connected subgraph

I have the impression that if I take a simple, connected graph then I can (provided it has a vertex number greater than or equal to 2) remove a vertex and obtain a connected subgraph.

This doesn’t work with all vertices, there are some that I can’t remove.
For instance,
enter image description here

I can’t remove E without losing connectivity but I can remove A,B,C or D.

MEDevel.com: Open-source for Healthcare and Education

Collecting and validating open-source software for healthcare, education, enterprise, development, medical imaging, medical records, and digital pathology.

Visit Medevel

But there is always one that I can rule out. Do you have a way to prove this result?

>Solution :

Let G be any connected graph. Then G has at least one spanning tree. Let T be any spanning tree of G. Let v be any leaf of T. If we delete v, T \ {v} is connected, and is a subgraph of G \ {v} so G \ {v} is connected.

Well-known results this uses:

  • Every connected graph has at least 1 spanning tree
  • Deleting a leaf from an n-vertex tree results in an (n-1)-vertex tree
Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Discover more from Dev solutions

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading