I have a data set having parent and nested children in it. The purpose of this data is to traverse over parent to -> child1 to-> Child1Child …..
-> child2 to -> child1 to -> child2 to -> child3
-> child3 -> child4
Once the node end is reached start traversing reverse direction from end of node to start e.g. child2 where other children were left off and were not visited yet.
Data Set in parent child relationship
[
{
"id": 0,
"children": [
{
"id": 3,
"parentId": 0,
"children": [
{
"id": 6,
"parentId": 3,
"children": [
{
"id": 11,
"parentId": 6,
"children": [
{
"id": 10,
"parentId": 11,
"children": [
{
"id": 8,
"parentId": 10,
}
]
}
]
},
{
"id": 9,
"parentId": 6,
"children": [
{
"id": 1,
"parentId": 9,
"children": [
{
"id": 7,
"parentId": 1,
}
]
}
]
},
{
"id": 4,
"parentId": 6,
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
let result = [];
const handleTree = ( tree, count) => {
count = count || 0
const tree = _.clone(data);
if( tree ){
tree.forEach( ( t: any, i: string | number ) => {
let deepCopy = _.clone({...t });
delete deepCopy.children;
const { id, parentId } = deepCopy
result.push({ id, isVisited: true, parentId });
if( tree[i].children ){
handleTree(tree[i].children, count+1 )
}else{
//Completed start reading backward
// const getPreviousParent = findParentDetails(tree[i].parentId )
}
})
}
}
How to approach this problem?
So far I have been able to read the data in the same direction but, getting some unexpected results while going backward.
I hope I have explained the question well and it is making sense. Suggestions are welcomed.
>Solution :
Some comments on your attempt:
- There is no need to clone anything when you destructure into primitives. Also the deletion of
childrenfrom the clone would not be not needed. - To get the items also added on the way back, just do the same thing (the exact same
result.push) as on the way down. - You don’t need
i. Your loop variable is the node object that you need. - There isn’t a use for the
countin your code. - If every output object gets a
visited: trueproperty, then it doesn’t really add any useful information.
For such a traversal, a generator comes in handy: that way you don’t enforce that the results are collected in an array — you leave it to the caller to decide what to do with the values and whether or not to abort the traversal.
You could also add a property that indicates what the direction was (down or up).
Here is a possible implementation:
// Define a generator
function* handleTree(tree) {
for (const node of tree ?? []) {
// No need to clone when you destructure into primitive values:
const {id, parentId} = node;
yield { id, parentId, direction: "down" }; // on the way down
if (node.children) {
yield* handleTree(node.children);
}
yield { id, parentId, direction: "up" }; // on the way up
}
}
// Your example tree:
const tree = [{"id": 0,"children": [{"id": 3,"parentId": 0,"children": [{"id": 6,"parentId": 3,"children": [{"id": 11,"parentId": 6,"children": [{"id": 10,"parentId": 11,"children": [{"id": 8,"parentId": 10,}]}]},{"id": 9,"parentId": 6,"children": [{"id": 1,"parentId": 9,"children": [{"id": 7,"parentId": 1,}]}]},{"id": 4,"parentId": 6,}]}]}]}];
const result = [...handleTree(tree)]; // Collect into array
console.log(result);
