Follow

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
Contact

Unexpected behavior of Java ArrayList.set() method with multiplication in forEach loop

Setting initial array values (no issue):

import java.util.ArrayList;
public class arraylists {

    public static void main (String[] args) {
        ArrayList<Integer> numbers = new ArrayList<Integer>();
        numbers.add(3);
        numbers.add(1);
        numbers.add(4);
        numbers.add(2);
        System.out.println(numbers.toString());
    }
}

Console output: [3, 1, 4, 2]

Trying forEach addition (no issue):

MEDevel.com: Open-source for Healthcare and Education

Collecting and validating open-source software for healthcare, education, enterprise, development, medical imaging, medical records, and digital pathology.

Visit Medevel

numbers.forEach(number -> {
    numbers.set(numbers.indexOf(number), number + 10);
});
System.out.println(numbers.toString());

Console output: [13, 11, 14, 12]

Trying forEach multiplication:

numbers.forEach(number -> {
    numbers.set(numbers.indexOf(number), number * 2);
});
System.out.println(numbers.toString());

Console output: [6, 4, 8, 2]

My question is, why does the array after the multiplication loop have value 4 at index 1 and value 2 at index 3? Shouldn’t they be 1 * 2 = 2 and 2 * 2 = 4, respectively?

I tried the above code and was expecting after the forEach multiplication to have an array with values [6, 2, 8, 4]. Instead I got [6, 4, 8, 2].

>Solution :

indexOf returns the index of the first occurrence of a value. Let’s walk through the loop and see what’s going on.

  1. We start with [3, 1, 4, 2]
  2. The first element is 3. Its index is 0, so we get [6, 1, 4, 2]
  3. The second element is 1. Its index is 1, so we get [6, 2, 4, 2]
  4. The third element is 4. Its index is 2, so we get [6, 2, 8, 2]
  5. The fourth element is 2. Its first index is 1, so we get [6, 4, 8, 2]

Not only is this wrong (as you’ve seen), it also means that for each iteration you need to search the entire list (with indexOf) for a value that you already should have known where it is.

Using a good old for loop would be better suited here:

for (int i = 0; i < numbers.size(); ++i) {
    numbers.set(i, numbers.get(i) * 2);
}
Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Discover more from Dev solutions

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading